Dolores Cahill is a professor of Translational Science at University College, Dublin who was forced to resign from a scientific commission post because she disagreed with the lockdown and questioned the seriousness of this “virus.” Cahill explains why she would never take an experimental mRNA Covid-19 vaccine and why millions of people will die from organ failure months after receiving these injections. The deaths will be blamed on a “mutated” strain instead of the vaccines.
How do you rate this video?
Easy to understand?
0
Importance?
0
Urgence?
0
Credibility?
0
Learned from it?
0
Reasonable doubt WHO? – Pandemic? – Vaccines? – New Normal? – WHY? – ENOUGH!
References
http://www.dolorescahill.com
https://worldfreedomalliance.org
Deleted by YouTubehttps://worlddoctorsalliance.com/blog/theworldfreedomalliance2020announcementvideo/
REFERENCES:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/962c/58e6dc9c1ea550eb51ce70b0d7c83dc7eff6.pdf
https://philosophers-stone.info/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/58e6dc9c1ea550eb51ce70b0d7c83dc7eff6.pdf
Source Video (with a detailed bio on professor Cahill)https://www.bitchute.com/video/S5QLwPAN2pDD/
Alexandra Henrion-Caude
Transcript
This is a paper from I think 2012
Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines
on challenge with the SARS virus.
The issue when you inject messenger RNA,
if it had the protein from the virus
this positive RNA can go into our cells.
The spike protein from the virus
and maybe exposed to the immune system
Then the body starts mounting
including an anti-body response.
Say that happens in December,
and people would start doing that
that process would start.
But if in february, march, april…
another corona virus
that would be like a challenge
you know the SARS is
or it could even be the common cold.
But what happened in this study
the animal models after being challenged
So the last line of the abstract said:
Caution in proceding to the application
in humans is indicated.
And so the name for this thing
or cytokine storm or immunopriming
This is why there has been no vaccine
It’s because you get this issue
starts expressing the virus…
and then when it comes across
could be a month a year
but then the people get very, very ill
And they also saw this
If you look at half way down the paragraph,
most of the children who were given
“Most of the children experienced
that led to a high frequency
and 2 children out of 35 died.”
And the conclusion from this was that:
“The disease was enhanced
So what people need to know
after you’re vaccinated
you will have much higher *** (cut off).
…death as in the children in this study
And why I came up with this
we, the people
and what we do not want is
let’s say in february, march, april
that that is called
We will have to monitor
and there is predictions
for large amounts of adverse events
is that, if there is increase deaths
and we don’t want those deaths
They are this issue about vaccine
and have a higher chance of death.
Not because of a circulating virus
Weeks or months ahead.
That’s all, thank you very much.
Dolores, can you just explain a bit more
Just so people understand.
The Cytokine Storm is…
this is well known
So I will just give you…
these are slides that I prepared
The Cytokine Storm is,
when you put RNA genes,
or vaccine
you bypass
which would build up
to prevent the vaccine
So that suddenly the mRNA
and it uses the human machinery
to express the human proteins,
so that suddenly the virus
and then your immune system
as something that should not be there
But the shocking thing is…
that normally you can get rid
It’s a slow thing
this mRNA, why it’s so deadly,
is that now it goes into your genes
It starts stimulating the immune response
and it litterally,
because the source of the viral protein,
you now become like a
and your body is expressing
And so, slowly your immune system
But your amounting this super,
exquisite anti-bodies to get rid of it.
But you never can because it’s now
And we now, the people getting this,
that will be making a virus protein
So then when you naturally
or the RSV as these children did.
The virus you breath it in…
and it goes on to your mucosale system
Normally you would just get rid
you mount an immune response.
But what it does is…
because that one or two viruses
will suddenly trigger
which normally happens
But then suddenly the anti-body response
oh my God, this viral protein
So then the anti-bodies
What I’ve been saying since May is
they will go into like septic shock…
and then they will go
within three, four or five days…
and they will die,
potentially, within seven to ten days.
So what I’ve been saying and helping
is that we can distinguish
So on the 19th of March 2020
that the Corona virus…
the causitive agent of Covid-19
That was reported and is still there
So that means there is no reason
In an autopsy you can distinguish
and it’s a virus as a causive agent
the inflamation is in your lungs
But if it was to do with an adverse event
all of your lungs will
So a pathologists can take material
and distinguish an adverse reaction
made on dog tissue with Corona.
So you can look
But if we now have deaths from
is that people will have organ failure
So that autopsies will have to be done
which have been vaccinated
Because we can clearly distinguish
where the immune system
If I can just share my screen to add up
I think it will be important.
Iit is…
this paper that I’ve been
as to the informed consent
to any vaccine trial subjects.
So any person who is currently
of the risks of Covid-19 vaccines,
So with this aspect
and with the fact that it is
than Dolores made it,
given the response
that is a specific response
So it is highly expected
will be more at risk, actually,
that we are putting in front
So basically this article,
I really like the conclusion…
because the conclusion
It is an ethical aspect
The specific and significant
this
should have been and should be
disclosed to research subjects
as well as those being recruted
and future patients
in order to meet the
of patient comprehension
This is really important.
There have been in the history
oh, you knew enough
I feel extremely concerned,
even though
when I read that kind of conclusion…
and when I read
to raise that concern to the people.
Everyone needs to know
and they have freedom
whether or not they want
But also there’s a moral,
on health professionals and scientists,
and regulators and politicians,
that people are not given interventions…
that cause them more harm than good.
And that they need to be fully informed.
That’s why the censoring
in political debate and in newspapers
about the information
actually have huge adverse events
If this happens in march,
why did doctors and scientists
now that we are being censored
So I agree with
There is a huge issue
People need to know about it
So it’s great to have the opportunity
– Thank you Alexandra.
Yeah, this is about being transparent really.
And now I’m really happy
will “fact-check” and all these things…
will get hold on what we’re sharing…
because, once again,
scientific literature that neither
It’s all out there.
