TV and big newspapers always in favor of big industry, how come?

Extract of “5GRANDE MINACCIA p.22 – Marco Pizzuti Dossier 5G”
di Massimo Mazzucco

How do you rate this video?

Easy to understand?	0
Importance?	0
Urgence?	0
Credibility?	0
Learned from it?	0
Average

English subtitles

And yet, the studies all main stream newspapers,
as you say, refer to…

…are somehow always all in favor of
the manufacturer (the industry), why?

Well, because, obviously, we are talking about
a situation of power here, that is unequal.

We know that the media, in some way,
are always financed directly or indirectly…

through the commercials etc.
by the industry

And rhen there are journalists,
who go straight “by the coin”,

…who have close relationships
with industry…

…and they’re ready to write an article
whenever an occasion comes up.

An article in favor of industry obviously.

In fact, I’d bet my reputation on it…

…that in the near future
there will be no televised debate…

…on an equal footing
between the pros and cons.

What we should see is a confrontation
between scientists, in an open dialogue,

…and from that
mature our conclusions.

Instead, we will only and exclusively
be hearing the voice of the industry.

And if some case
a more critical scientist is invited…

…surely he will face a firing squad
more than a debate,

…that is, four or five adversaries…

…who won’t let him speak
or allow to express himself.

And who, during the confrontation, will
be filmed by the cameramen while smiling…

…and kind of make fun of
the unfortunate scientist who faces them.

Just like we said, among other things,

…in the video “The ministry of truth”,
that you subscribed by the way,

…we said,
you will never see on television…

because among the biggest financiers of
television, in other words advertising,

…we find precisely the phone companies
and pharmaceutical companies…

… you will in fact never see
a real real debate…

…either on vaccine safety,
or on the safety of 5G.

At best, we said,
they will have fake debates…

…in which they put the
opposite voice in the minority…

…precisely to underline among the public
the idea that they are wrong.